ASTURIAR PROLETALGOAK EUSKAL
HERRIA DEFENDITU ZUEN, EUSKAL NAZIONALISTEK FRANCORI OPARITU ZIOTEN
Milizia proletarioa; Bilbo, Bizkaia. |
POPULAR
FRONT SURRENDERS SANTANDER
(by Felix Morrow)
Socialist Appeal
(organ of the
Socialist Party of New York, Left Wing Branches)
4. zenbakia, 1937ko irailaren 4a
Basque Chiefs
Fear Workers
[...] the
absolute uniformity of the Basque policy of surredering all industrial cities intact has no
counterpart in any modern war, not to speak of civil wars!
Double
Treachery
The "iron
ring" defending Bilbao had been built months previously under the
direction of an engineer who had shortly escaped to fascist territory. The fascists,
then, had the plans of the fortifications and could skirt and flank them, as
they actually did. But the treachery of the engineer was only made public after
fascists had broken through the fortifications; it was then adduced as the
alibi of Basque goverment. But months had intervened since his flight. Why was
nothing done to construct a new system of fortifications in the interim?
Furthermore, no
offensive was begun on the central front to force Franco to divert troops from
the Basque front. Nor were airplanes sent from Madrid, then quiet, to defend
Bilbao. Why? Had the Negrin goverment information which made it certain that
Bilbao would surrender? Was it, perhaps, a party to the decision? Certainly no
other hypothesis explains the passivity of the Negrin Goverment during the
march on Bilbao during June. The
Stalinist alibi that the Negrin cabinet (established May 27) had not had time to organize a campaign on the
Madrid or Aragon fronts is absurd on the face of it; no military man worth his
salt would deny that three weeks —not to speak of preparations by the Caballero
cabinet in which the Prieto-bourgeois-Stalinist forces had the commanding
voice— was enough to organize a large-scale offensive.
Our suspicions
are completely justified by the manner in which Bilbao
surrendered. No attempt was made to defend the city. Not a single factory or
wharf was damaged by fascist shells before its fall. The Asturian miners
managed to dynamite some of the bridges; but when sought to destroy supplies
which were being left behind, and factories manufacturing war-materials, they
were driven out of the city at gun-point, or, worse, disarmed by National
Republican Guards and Basque soldiers of the regular army and held so that thet
might fall into hands of the fascists! The Guards “maintained order” until
Franco’s forces arrived; patrolled the streets while the fascists troops
marched in; then most of them donned Carlist red berets and went to work for
Franco!
These
unquestioned facts do not come from any private source. Most of them were
reported by regular news-correspondets, including the London Times’ G. L.
Steer, a Loyalist sympathizer. Neither here nor abroad did the Stalinists deny
these facts. They “ingnored” them as did the Negrin goverment. With the result
that the Basque Goverment has consumated its treachery by similarly
surrendering Santander and fleeing the country. This outcome was inevitable: for
the "liberal" bourgeoisie has no basic stake in fighting fascism. As agents and
partners of British and French capital in Spain, the Basque bourgeoisie had no
enthusiasm for joining Franco, with his German and Italian commitments. But
more than they hated Franco, they hated the masses of the UGT and CNT. They
supported Prieto and the Stalinists in reconstructing the bourgeois state, in
depriving the workers of the conquests they had won in crushing the fascists in
the chief cities. But despite all repressions, the bourgeoisie had no
guarantees that a victory over Franco would nor galvanize the working class
into taking complete power. Against this eventuality only Franco could
guarantee them.
Nothing learned
Neither the
treachery of the Basque bougeoisie, nor the continued blockade of Franco and
English imperialism, serve to convince the bourgeois-Prieto-Stalinist bloc that
their course is false. Nothing can convince the Peoples Front coalition of
this. They are determined to win, if at all —and not a few of the goverment leaders
prefer a compromise with Franco to the possible dangers of proletarian power
after victory— on the basis of so thoroughly consolidating a bourgeois regime
that Anglo-French imperialism, reassured, will come to their aid. [...]
—F. Morrow, Socialist
Appeal (1937-9-4)
http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/themilitant/socialist-appeal-1937/sep-04-1937.pdf
http://www.icl-fi.org/espanol/spe/36/espanola.html
"Grupo de dinamiteros vasco" |
trotskistak.blogspot